Is it for aesthetic reasons? I hope this qualifies as a programming question, as in any programming tutorial, you eventually come across 'foo' in the code examples. Void foo () { } void foo (void) { } is there a difference between these two?
Consider these two function definitions: Foo and bar are names for variables, classes, whatever that have no meaning and are often used in examples. (yeah, right?) what does 'foo' really mean?
Furthermore this terminology in some way serves as a. I know there is a difference, i just don't understand the definitions i have found in various books. The terms foobar /ˈfʊːbɑː/, fubar, or foo, bar, baz and qux (alternatively quux) are sometimes used as placeholder names (also referred to as metasyntactic variables) in. 原文: the terms foobar, foo, bar, baz and qux are sometimes used as placeholder names (also referred to as metasyntactic variables) in computer programming or.
Several times i've found these terms in scientific articles. What is the foo in def function(foo): In many program test case or example case, i always see bar and foo, what is the two word represent for and why choose this two words as example? The first documented foo in tech circles is probably 1959 's dictionary of the tmrc language:
The sacred syllable (foo mani padme hum); Used for when you can use def function(): I've always wanted to know what the foo, bar, baz, etc.