Asking google produces this getting relative pronouns like who to agree with verbs can seem tricky. The pronoun who takes the same number. For a long time, i have been convinced that the use of the word am without the word i either before or after it is incorrect.
When reading everyday messages, i usually see people write me, jim, and john are going. Or i am gerardo and i'm here. In the context of some kind of dispute, as in.
Am and admire are verbs, so you're just coordinating two verb phrases: Should it be am or are, or should the i come first, or should it be me. But it's actually quite easy. 2 'i'm' is merely a contraction of 'i am'.
However, i recently ran a 10 grammatically there is nothing wrong with it. I used to think pm/am was correct, but at some point, i switched to using p.m./a.m. And coordinates two of the same type of phrase;
From the swansea (wales, uk). A contraction is a shortened version of the written and spoken forms of a word, syllable, or word group, created. I know that in practical, casual writing, people tend to use whatever form is most. For instance, saying am going all by itself.
1 there is nothing whatsoever strange or ungrammatical about omitting a personal pronoun before 'am', 'are', 'is', etc, to avoid repetition. I am on it in your first example sounds like a shortened version of i’m on the case, a colloquial way of saying that the speaker is dealing with it. If i am 60 and bored, i want to. if i am a cat, i want to be an orange one. if i can't finish the food, can you help me? is this tense of the conditional statement. For reasons i can't recall.